| |
|
2002 CONFERENCE
|
|
PRESENTATION
With the expected renewal of the profession, are the universities going to be staffed by a new professional class of teachers and researchers, equipped with a new ethical code in order to cope with the transformed role of universities in higher education and innovation? In a world of increased " virtual learning ", is teaching still a public service - that would justify the civil servant status prevailing in many countries of Europe - or has education become an open market inducing different loyalties ? Can scientific creativity be encouraged by " exchanging " staff with external partners, industry in particular, at a time when skills and competences have become the key words in academic human resource management rather science development ? What are the pressures existing today on the institution and how can it take them into account? What does it imply for the individual professor in terms of the selection of research topics or of teaching commitments? How does the institution protect or steer the choices of academic activities made by members of the university? What does it all mean in terms of contracts or staff development? Do other protection devices apart from tenure exist to ensure academic creativity? Do private contracts represent an opportunity for the university to adapt to change? What is employment security and how can it be redefined for a world in constant reorganisation? The seminar, with the support of key partners in society, did help the Observatory to formulate the common elements of an accepted balance between flexibility for innovation and the security provided by permanent appointments, re-qualification, staff development or various forms of contract policy. It had been documented by a study comparing the recent legal and administrative changes in human resource management at universities in eight European countries, a paper that has been commissioned from Prof. Ulrike Felt, from the Institute for the Sociology of Science at the University of Vienna. This is also the core of the booklet entitled "Managing University Autonomy" that reflects the debate of the session. The format of the meeting was a structured conversation to which all 25 to 30 participants had been invited to contribute freely, Ms Bernadette Conraths, former director of the European Foundation for Management Development, acting as a facilitator of the one day encounter.
|